A Program to Forget Past Review
By A student (Brandeis University) - abroad from 01/19/2014 to 05/02/2014 with
Boston University: Antigua & San Bartolo - Guatemala Archaeology Program
I learned that archaeology may, in fact, not be the professional field for me. If, on the other hand, it does prove to be my calling, it will surely not be in archaeology of the Maya
Personal Information
How much international exposure did you have prior to this program? | None |
Review Your Program
* Overall educational experience
Academic rigor, intensity, resources, etc. |
The focus on academic rigor and intensity was inconsistent and misguided, at best. While the Archaeological Methods course (given in Antigua by the graduate students) should have focused on applicable field methodology to be applied at the site, we instead spent too much time reading, reviewing, and discussing articles on archaeological theory. In fact, so much time was devoted to this, that there was often very little time left in any given day to study Spanish, leaving students incapable of communication in the city and at Xultun. Worse, when we weren't aimlessly wasting hours of class time repeating theoretical opinions, we were instructed in archaeological methods by means of cheap toys and foolish games. The prevailing sense was that we were not so much college students in search of professional training, but rather immature children in need of supervision and distraction. |
* Host Country Program Administration
On-site administration of your program |
Administration was entirely lacking. If there had been any administration, it was conducted secretively and without an understanding on behalf of the participant students. If any problems arose, they were best solved on one's own, as the "program director" was absent more often than not and the graduate students hired by the university were of little or no help. |
* Housing:
How satisfied were you with your living arrangements? |
|
* Food: |
|
* Social & Cultural Integration:
How integrated did you feel with the local culture? |
|
* Health Care:
How well were health issues addressed during the program? |
If it were possible to provide a rating lower than 1/2 star for this category, I would without hesitation. Unfortunately, during my time in the program, I was confronted by a couple of medical issues. The first, and most noteworthy, was a sudden onset of severe lightheadedness one night in Antigua. After calling to receive a ride to the hospital, I waited a good while for a local associate of the program to come by and drive me, only to learn that he was heavily intoxicated--he drove regardless. Once at the hospital, a grad student provided translation, though there remainded constant miscommunication. Afterwards, the issue of payment haunted me for the next 3 months, despite having the recommended traveler's insurance. |
* Safety: |
|
If you could do it all over again would you choose the same program? |
No
|
Finances
* Money: How easily were you able to live on a student's budget?
(1 = not very easy/$200+ on food & personal expenses/week, 2.5 = $100/week, 5 = very easily/minimal cost) |
|
Language
* Did your program have a foreign language component? | Yes |
How much did the program encourage you to use the language?
0 = No encouragement, 5 = frequent encouragement to use the language |
|
How would you rate your language skills at the beginning of the program? | None |
How would you rate your language skills at the end of the program? | Intermediate |
Other Program Information
* Where did you live?
Select all that apply |
|
* Who did you live with?
Select all that apply |
|
* Who did you take classes with?
Select all that apply |
|
About how many local friends did you make that you will likely keep in touch with? | 0 |
A Look Back
* What did you like most about the program? |
|
* What could be improved? |
|
* What do you know now that you wish you knew before going on this program? | How poorly the undergraduates taken on the program are treated. If I had known this then, I would never have gone. |