Sciences Po Paris in the Spring Past Review
By Taylor D (Tourism and Travel Services Management., The University of Texas at Austin) for
Sciences Po: Paris - Direct Enrollment & Exchange
It was incredible, overall. Yes, I had some difficulties, and yes, there were some things that I disliked, however-- It was amazing!! The only thing that I would change, was my own personal commitment to learning the language.
Personal Information
How much international exposure did you have prior to this program? | 0-2 weeks |
Review Your Program
* Overall educational experience
Academic rigor, intensity, resources, etc. |
I had a really inconsistent experience, in general. I had a couple classes that were exceptionally interesting and that I would consider practical and academic. However, in general, I felt that Sciences Po places too high an emphasis on student presentation, which oftentimes leads to wasted time. The Sciences Po semester is 12 weeks, with classes only meeting once a week. When you factor in that each class requires every student to make a 30 minute presentation (in a class of 15-25 students) obviously a large chunk of the time spent in class will be dedicated to presentations. In a couple of my classes, we never really got anywhere. Others, that were taught in English but by non-native English speakers were choppy and bad. I had 2-3 classes that were great, and to be honest the rest didn't hit the mark. Also, with 5-7 classes fitting a whole semester's worth of exams, essays, and presentations into 12 weeks, it seems overwhelmingly fast and concentrated. The workload was very heavy, with the payoff not being so great. |
* Host Country Program Administration
On-site administration of your program |
Too much bureaucracy, too few staff members. Sciences-Po has limited resources, for sure. |
* Housing:
How satisfied were you with your living arrangements? |
I was in a Chambre de bonne of about 10 square meters on the 8th floor, without an elevator. |
* Food: |
|
* Social & Cultural Integration:
How integrated did you feel with the local culture? |
|
* Health Care:
How well were health issues addressed during the program? |
|
* Safety: |
|
If you could do it all over again would you choose the same program? |
Yes
|
Finances
* Money: How easily were you able to live on a student's budget?
(1 = not very easy/$200+ on food & personal expenses/week, 2.5 = $100/week, 5 = very easily/minimal cost) |
|
Do you have any general money-saving tips for future study abroad participants? | Like I mentioned above, I would perhaps suggest not spending the money on the Welcome program. Aside from that, it was all reasonable. |
Language
* Did your program have a foreign language component? | Yes |
How would you rate your language skills at the beginning of the program? | Beginner |
What was the highest level language course you had completed prior to departure? | FRE 322 |
If applicable, to what degree did your living situation aid your language acquisition? |
|
Language acquisition improvement? |
Since its a bilingual school, you have the option of how many courses you want to take in French. I only took two french classes, one being a french language class. I wish that I had spent more time focusing on learning the language. This wasn't Sciences-po's fault. |
Direct Enrollment/Exchange
* Did you study abroad through an exchange program or did you directly enroll in the foreign university? | Exchange |
Other Program Information
* Where did you live?
Select all that apply |
|
* Who did you live with?
Select all that apply |
|
* Who did you take classes with?
Select all that apply |
|
A Look Back
* What do you know now that you wish you knew before going on this program? | It requires a lot of independence. If you are looking for more hand-holding, look elsewhere. |
Individual Course Reviews
Course Name/Rating: |
Race, Immigration, and Political Culture in France, the US and Great Britain |
Course Department: | |
Instructor: | Andrew Diamond |
Instruction Language: | English |
Comments: | WONDERFUL COURSE! Well organized, fun, interesting, important subject matter. |
Credit Transfer Issues: |
Course Name/Rating: |
Metropolitan Culture and Science |
Course Department: | |
Instructor: | Stephen Van Damme |
Instruction Language: | English |
Comments: | Boring and seemingly trivial. |
Credit Transfer Issues: |
Course Name/Rating: |
Christian Churches and European Integration |
Course Department: | |
Instructor: | Friedrich Bokern |
Instruction Language: | English |
Comments: | Always behind schedule. Got off topic too often. Course was interesting, but too much time spent on logistics and presentations. |
Credit Transfer Issues: |
Course Name/Rating: |
Cultural Triangulations: Africa, North America, and Europe |
Course Department: | |
Instructor: | Mike Ladd |
Instruction Language: | English |
Comments: | |
Credit Transfer Issues: |
Course Name/Rating: |
Gender and Politics |
Course Department: | |
Instructor: | Virginie Dutoya |
Instruction Language: | English |
Comments: | Good course. |
Credit Transfer Issues: |
Course Name/Rating: |
L'Identite Sexuelle en Questions |
Course Department: | |
Instructor: | Bruno Perreau and Emmanuelle Huisman-Perrin |
Instruction Language: | French |
Comments: | Interesting subject matter. Not well structured. Too much emphasis on presentation. |
Credit Transfer Issues: |