Loved Scotland, but St. Andrews was a little disappointing Past Review
By A student (Political Science and Government., Middlebury College) - abroad from 01/23/2013 to 06/01/2013 with
University of St. Andrews: St. Andrews - Direct Enrollment & Exchange
Overall, being abroad was a wonderful experience and allowed me to experience so many things that I would not have otherwise had the opportunity to. Scotland is a wonderful country and I really enjoyed my time there, as well as all the St. Andrews students that I met and became friends with during my time abroad. Given the choice, I would absolutely go abroad again but would choose a different program within Scotland (probably the University of Edinburgh) or a more experiential learning type program.
Personal Information
How much international exposure did you have prior to this program? | 2 weeks - 1 month |
Review Your Program
* Overall educational experience
Academic rigor, intensity, resources, etc. |
St. Andrews was very academically rigorous and offered many interesting classes across every major. I honestly had a hard time choosing my classes because there were so many interesting options. However, the school's resources and some of the professor were a bit disappointing. In general, professors had little contact with students. While one of my professors was phenomenal and very engaged with his students, the other treated the entire class as a nuisance and often made insulting comments about our intelligence and/or work. Accessing periodicals/other research materials was also very difficult due to the relatively small size of the St. Andrews library to the student body. However, overall it was a positive experience and I learned a lot relevant to my major. The St. Andrews students in my classes were also fantastic and were an absolute plus in my experience. Collaboration on work is much more common at St. Andrews, and the other students would always come very prepared with interesting material to discuss at study sessions. However - just a word of warning - don't expect the same level of engagement and respect from professors/the administration that you get at Middlebury. |
* Host Country Program Administration
On-site administration of your program |
The study abroad office at St. Andrews was pretty understaffed - there are only three people working there. While they were all very nice and sought to help where the could, they seemed overwhelmed and didn't really do anything to help with our transition into life at St. Andrews except during the first 2-3 days. The other administrators at St. Andrews were also pretty disengaged and dismissive of student. I didn't interact with them too much (though I know some abroad students who did), but the few times that I did it was a very unpleasant experience and usually unhelpful. |
* Housing:
How satisfied were you with your living arrangements? |
I lived in David Russell Apartments, which were very nice apartment style dorms about a 20 minute walk from town and the main part of campus. My room was large and new, and I loved the social aspect of the flats - my flatmates are some of the best/closest friends that I have from abroad. My one complaint is that it was very far from campus and town, which made things a lot more difficult (especially coming in mid-year) in terms of adjusting. I think it would be better if study abroad students weren't put in David Russell given how much further away it is, but with the exception of the distance I thought it was great. |
* Food: |
Scottish food, so it was pretty heavy and so-so. There was also enough though and a good variety at the dining hall, which was really conveniently located. No Middlebury, but bad at all for a semester |
* Social & Cultural Integration:
How integrated did you feel with the local culture? |
The majority of my friends from St. Andrews are either English or Scottish, and there were lots of events/trips that allowed you to immerse yourself in the local culture. I attended a ceilidh (traditional Scottish dance) my first week in St. Andrews, which was a great introduction to Scotland and a blast. |
* Health Care:
How well were health issues addressed during the program? |
|
* Safety: |
St. Andrews is probably one of the safest places you could go abroad. There was essentially no crime and I never felt unsafe, regardless of the time of day or night. |
If you could do it all over again would you choose the same program? |
No
|
Finances
* Money: How easily were you able to live on a student's budget?
(1 = not very easy/$200+ on food & personal expenses/week, 2.5 = $100/week, 5 = very easily/minimal cost) |
Other than grocery expenses (lunch wasn't included in the meal plan) and bus fare, living in St. Andrews wasn't too expensive and you could definitely get by not spending too much. |
Not including program expenses, about how much money did you spend on food and other expenses each week? | $100 |
Do you have any general money-saving tips for future study abroad participants? | Buy weekly bus passes instead of individual tickets - it's much cheaper and more convenient. |
Language
* Did your program have a foreign language component? | No |
Direct Enrollment/Exchange
* Did you study abroad through an exchange program or did you directly enroll in the foreign university? | Direct Enrollment |
Other Program Information
* Where did you live?
Select all that apply |
|
* Who did you live with?
Select all that apply |
|
* Who did you take classes with?
Select all that apply |
|
About how many local friends did you make that you will likely keep in touch with? |
A Look Back
* What did you like most about the program? |
|
* What could be improved? |
|
* What do you know now that you wish you knew before going on this program? | There are three main things I wish I had known before going to St. Andrews: First, you are not guaranteed any of the classes that you enter online before coming to St. Andrews. While the online class selection process seems like it is saving a spot in the class, St. Andrews students of all years receive priority over abroad students and many people found that all their classes were full when they arrived on campus. Second, a catered room does not mean you will get all your meals in the dining hall. Many of the catered rooms only have a partial meal plan (I had 14 meals/week for example), which was very hard for the people who didn't live in apartment style housing (I luckily did) and had to cook a good chunk of their meals in hall kitchens/pay for food. Lastly, dealing with the St. Andrews administration is very difficult and frustrating. This was probably the biggest negative about my experience, which is really disappointing because it affects a lot of your life at St. Andrews. Use your home institution as much as you can, but know that accomplishing anything is very hard when it comes to dealing with the St. Andrews administration. |
Individual Course Reviews
Course Name/Rating: |
International Relations of the European Union |
Course Department: | International Relations |
Instructor: | Holgar Stritzel |
Instruction Language: | English |
Comments: | Phenomenal class and professor. The material was challenging, but very interesting and Professor Stritzel was a gem. Not only did he really care about his students, but he was highly structured and had a lot to add to the class in terms of his personal experience (he previously worked for the UN). We were assessed based on weekly journal entries, a presentation, and a final exam. These were assessed very fairly, and we a good measure of both our learning and engagement with the class materials. |
Credit Transfer Issues: | I don't know yet - my credits have not transferred yet. |
Course Name/Rating: |
International Relations of Post Communisty Central and Eastern Europe |
Course Department: | International Relations |
Instructor: | Rick Fawn |
Instruction Language: | English |
Comments: | While the course material was interesting, Professor Fawn taught it in a way that was very jaded and steeped in his own personal opinions. Any idea expressed which was not in line with his own beliefs - which were very narrow and often expressed in highly negative ways - would be treated with extreme disrespect, regardless of whether it was factual or not. I witnessed him completely dismiss and undermine several students in our tutorial throughout the term, which acted as a significant disincentive to class participation. In addition, Professor Fawn often seemed ill prepared for class and would contradict himself during lecture. Grading was capricious and inconsistent with the standards that both St. Andrews and Professor Fawn provided for the course. Assessment was limited to two papers and the final exam. This is not a course or professor I would recommend to future students. |
Credit Transfer Issues: | I don't know - I haven't yet completed my credit transfer. |